Memo iss apple tim cook12/9/2023 ![]() ![]() Here it is (emphasis ours):įirst, the government would have us write an entirely new operating system for their use. It explains a little more about its reasons for opposing the order: security risks and legal precedent. On Monday, Apple added a FAQ section to its website about the San Bernardino case. Donald Trump, the Republican presidential frontrunner, has called for Americans to boycott Apple until it complies.Īnd Reuters reports that victims of the San Bernardino attack will call on Apple to assist the FBI. Could be a troubling precedent."īut many argue that Apple has a duty to aid law enforcement. But that's wholly different than requiring companies to enable hacking of customer devices and data. We build secure products to keep your information safe, and we give law enforcement access to data based on valid legal orders. Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google, said: "We know that law enforcement and intelligence agencies face significant challenges in protecting the public against crime and terrorism. "These demands would create a chilling precedent and obstruct companies' efforts to secure their products," it continued. "In other words, this isn't just about one iPhone - it's about all of our software and all of our digital devices, and if this precedent gets set, it will spell digital disaster for the trustworthiness of everyone's computers and mobile phones." Apple's friends - and enemiesįacebook, Google, and Twitter have all expressed support for Apple in its legal battle.įacebook said in a statement that the company would "continue to fight aggressively against requirements for companies to weaken the security of their systems." ![]() "If a court can legally compel Apple to do that, then it likely could also legally compel any other software provider to do the same, including compelling the secret installation of malware via automatic updates to your phone or laptop's operating system or other software. "What the court is essentially ordering Apple to do is custom-build malware to undermine its own product's security features and then cryptographically sign that software so the iPhone will trust it as coming from Apple," he said. Kevin Bankston, director of the nonprofit New America's Open Technology Institute, previously told Business Insider he thought the issue was indeed about a precedent. Nonetheless, lawyers and advocacy groups have expressed concerns about the precedent the case could set. Fourteen people were slaughtered and many more had their lives and bodies ruined." He said: "The San Bernardino litigation isn't about trying to set a precedent or send any kind of message. On Sunday, FBI Director James Comey responded in a blog post. "We can find no precedent for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack." "The government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our customers - including tens of millions of American citizens - from sophisticated hackers and cybercriminals," he wrote. Cook began by publishing an open letter to Apple's website warning that complying would make users less safe. "Apple would gladly participate in such an effort." War of wordsĪpple and the FBI have been trading public barbs since the court order last week. "We feel the best way forward would be for the government to withdraw its demands under the All Writs Act and, as some in Congress have proposed, form a commission or other panel of experts on intelligence, technology and civil liberties to discuss the implications for law enforcement, national security, privacy and personal freedoms," Cook writes to employees. The FBI says it needs to access the phone's encrypted data to find more about the killers (and to potentially avoid future attacks), while Apple argues that complying would create a dangerous precedent.Īpple is calling for the government to launch a commission of experts to examine the effects of encryption technology on law enforcement. In it, Cook says the FBI should withdraw its demand to have the Cupertino, California, company develop a tool to help it break into the iPhone: "At stake is the data security of hundreds of millions of law-abiding people, and setting a dangerous precedent that threatens everyone's civil liberties," he writes.Ī court last week ordered Apple to comply, but the company is challenging the order. The memo was obtained by BuzzFeed's John Paczkowski. It often indicates a user profile.Īpple CEO Tim Cook has sent a memo to all employees explaining why the company is resisting an FBI request to decrypt an iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters. Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |